When We Can’t Reproduce It, How Should We Label the Case?
Some AI answers look wrong, but we can’t reproduce them. The model updated. The prompt is gone. The output is real. How should the forum label these cases?
The Commons
Introductions, community standards, unresolved cases, and broader discussions about trust, responsibility, and responsible AI use.
Should Members Be Required to Show the Full Prompt, or Is the Claim and Evidence Enough?
The forum asks for the prompt, the output, and the evidence. But how much of the prompt should be required? I think the answer is not obvious. Here are the options, the trade-offs, and what I'm asking the community to decide.
What would make you trust a community that admits when an AI answer cannot be verified?
This community says "unresolved" when it can't verify a claim. That's unusual. Most places force a verdict. I want to know what would make you trust a place that doesn't.